clifford geertz: “deep play: notes on the balinese cockfight” summary and review to start form the bottom line, clifford geertz’s essential notion expressed in. “Deep Play: Notes on the Balinese Cockfight” is one of Clifford Geertz’s most influential articles which illustrates not only the meaning of a given. Perhaps one of the most widely read anthropological essays, “Deep Play: Notes on the Balinese Cockfight” by Clifford Geertz is available.

Author: Braran Mikus
Country: Zimbabwe
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Career
Published (Last): 14 May 2013
Pages: 434
PDF File Size: 14.74 Mb
ePub File Size: 2.37 Mb
ISBN: 962-9-33349-477-3
Downloads: 53834
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Tojakazahn

Deep Play: Notes on the Balinese Cockfight by Clifford Geertz

The elite, which is not itself so very puritan, worries about the poor, ignorant peasant gambling all his money away, about what foreigners will think, about the waste of time better devoted to building up the country. In the case of the Balinese cockfight, a deep fight is one in which results are unpredictable, the odds are more even and the bets are more balanced. Cockfights tetadjen; sabungan are held in a ring about fifty feet square. What sets the cockfight apart from the ordinary course of life, lifts it from the realm of everyday practical affairs, and surrounds it with an aura of enlarged importance is not, as functionalist sociology would have it, that it reinforces status discriminations [such reinforcement is hardly necessary in a society where every act proclaims thembut that it provides a metasocial commentary upon the whole matter of assorting human beings into fixed hierarchical ranks and then organizing the major part of collective existence around that assortment.

The best discussion of cockfighting is again Bateson and Mead Balinese Character, pp.

Further, the Supreme Court defense of same-gendered unions? Of Cocks and Men. Enveloped elsewhere in a haze of etiquette, a thick cloud of euphemism and ceremony, gesture and allusion, they are here cockfigh in only the thinnest disguise of an animal mask, a mask which in fact demonstrates them far more effectively than it conceals them.

But such terminological problems are in any cast secondary to the essential point: Novels are said to have strength, buildings eloquence, plays momentum, ballets repose. Usually they begin toward late afternoon and run three or four hours until sunset. Red pepper is stuffed down their beaks and up their anuses to give them spirit. But the poet [as opposed to the historian]. As there is no food in the house, however, the hero tells his wife geetrz kill the last cock for dinner.


And finally, there are those, the really substantial members of the community, the solid citizenry around whom local life revolves, who fight in the larger fights and bet on them around the side.

In the first place, there are two sorts of bets, or toh.

In Bali, the cocks are only fighting symbolically–they are stand-ins for their trainers. That is, if he shouts gasal, “five,” he wants the underdog at five-to-four or, for him, four-to-five ; if he shouts “four,” he wants it at four-to-three again, he putting up the “three”if “nine” at nine-to-eight, and so on. The Balinese cockfight is, as Geertz puts it, a way of playing with fire without getting burned.

This principle is extended logically. They are both in over their heads.

In detail, the fit is not, of course, exact, but the general pattern is quite consistent: The extremes to which this madness is conceived on occasion to go–and the fact that it is considered madness–is demonstrated by the Balinese folk tale I Tuhung Kuning. The connection of cocks and cockfighting with such Powers, with the animalistic demons that threaten constantly to invade the small, cleared off space in which the Balinese have so carefully built their lives and devour its inhabitants, is quite explicit.

Anonymous January 5, at 1: Such an extension of the notion of a text beyond written material, and even beyond verbal, is, though metaphorical, not, of course, cockifght that novel.

Deep Play: Notes on the Balinese Cockfight – Wikipedia

On the individual level, people involved in an institutionalized hostility relationship, called puik, in which they do not speak or otherwise have anything to do with each other the causes of this formal breaking of relations are many: While cockfighting is not the only message or story that the Balinese tell themselves about themselves, it is an important one.

For reasons I shall come to, it is done somewhat differently from case to case, and is an obsessively deliberate affair. Second, the Balinese do not mathematically reduce odds, but bet directly in terms of stated odds as such. When the husband returns, the cocks, crowing a jingle, inform him of the deception and, furious, he sets out to kill the child. With the birds again in the hands of their handlers, the coconut is now sunk three times after which the cockight which has landed the blow must be set down to show that he is firm, a fact he demonstrates by wandering idly around the rink for cockfighf coconut sink.



Pr&#;cis for “Deep Play: Notes on the Balinese Cockfight” (Geertz ) – EM-Journal

Even in contexts where women do not in fact play much of a role–music, painting, certain agricultural activities–their absence, which is only relative in any case, is more a mere matter of fact than socially enforced.

The angle, of course, is stratificatory. The problem is to learn how to read them, not to decipher something else going on behind the scenes. The cocks are seen as extensions of the bodies of the men who own them.

Précis for “Deep Play: Notes on the Balinese Cockfight” (Geertz 1973)

We look forward to seeing you from January 2. I have frequently heard men say that the honor of winning was much more important than the money at stake. Notes on the Balinese Cockfight” is that a people’s culture is an ensemble of rituals which are in themselves ensembles, and these texts are what the anthropologist is trying to decipher.

Self-mockery seems to be an essential ingredient for making an anthropological classic. Saying Something of Something. And, as with those other embarrassments -opium smoking, begging, or uncovered breasts-it seeks, rather unsystematically, to put a stop to it. The reason it is disquietful is not that it has material effects it has some, but they are minor ; the reason that it is disquietful is that, joining pride to selfhood, selfhood to cocks, and cocks to destruction, it brings to imaginative realization a dimension of Balinese experience normally well-obscured from view.